20 Smart Tips for Local Radio

Bonus Playlist Analysis Content (Continued from Page 4)

At Norsk Lokalradioforbund 2025 in Bergen, I shared why music drives your listeners (Tip #20). To demonstrate how to apply these insights, when preparing the presentation, I asked my coworkers to randomly select a local radio station from Norway and sample one hour of their playlist. Let’s dive into this real-world playlist analysis using the slides from the conference, and see how you can optimize your station’s music to keep listeners tuned in.


Explore the analysis

Tempo Analysis: A Rollercoaster Without a Destination

Playlist Example | IT4RADIO

The sample hour’s flow resembles a sand clock abruptly flipped mid-fall - beginning with the slow, emotive weight of Mariah Carey’s "I Want to Know What Love Is" (09:04), gradually ascending through Shakira’s euphoric "Waka Waka" (09:14) and Janet Jackson’s danceable "Together Again" (09:18), only to peak abruptly with Rosé & Bruno Mars’ high-energy "APT" (09:32) before plunging back into the solemn depths of Michael Jackson’s "Will You Be There" (09:36) and Aerosmith’s 6-minute ballad "Amazing" (09:47).

Why This Matters:

Listener Moods Aren’t Mind Readers: A tempo arc this erratic assumes audiences will mirror its swings - from reflective to euphoric to somber, within minutes. In reality, most listeners seek consistent energy aligned with their daily routines (e.g., mornings = upbeat, evenings = relaxed).

Cognitive Dissonance: The whiplash between "APT" (140 BPM, celebratory) and "Will You Be There" (70 BPM, gospel-tinged) isn’t just a tempo shift: it’s a cultural and emotional disconnect. Gen Z fans of Rosé may flee, while Gen Xers drawn to Michael Jackson may resent the prior Gen Z skew.

Missed Opportunity:

The mid-hour energy peak ("Waka Waka" → "Together Again" → "APT") suggests a natural momentum the station could harness. Instead, the subsequent slowdown (Michael Jackson → Aerosmith) halts that energy like a power outage at a party.

Fix It Without Altering Variety:

Cluster Tempos Strategically: Group upbeat tracks (e.g., Shakira, Janet Jackson, Rosé) for daytime energy.
Reserve ballads (Mariah Carey, Michael Jackson) for evening wind-down.
Bridge the Gaps: Transition "APT" → "Beautiful People" (Ed Sheeran/Khalid) instead of "Will You Be There" - both modern, mid-tempo.

Save Aerosmith’s "Amazing" for a dedicated "Slow Jam Hour" where it feels intentional, not disruptive.

Test the "Sand Clock" Theory
If contrast is the goal, frame it: "We’re flipping the mood - from fiery to introspective. Next up: Michael Jackson’s ‘Will You Be There’ after Rosé & Bruno Mars."  Without context, these shifts feel accidental, not curated.

Conclusion:

Tempo is a tool, not a toy. Used thoughtfully, it guides listeners through moods seamlessly. Used haphazardly, it becomes audio whiplash. This playlist has the bones of decent momentum - it just needs a conductor.

Next: Playlist Analysis

Playlist Analysis: A Station Caught Between Generations

Playlist Example 2 | IT4RADIO

This playlist swings aggressively across eras (1993–2024), genres (pop, country, rock, K-pop, EDM, indie-folk), and emotional tones (nostalgic ballads, TikTok virality, stadium anthems). While eclecticism can work in specific formats (e.g., "Variety Hits"), here it feels unintentional - a local station trying to be all things to its entire community, rather than something essential to a core audience.

Key Observations:

1) Demographic Whiplash:

This playlist swings aggressively across eras (1984–2024), genres (pop, country, rock, K-pop, EDM, indie-folk), and emotional tones (nostalgic ballads, TikTok virality, stadium anthems). While eclecticism can work in specific formats (e.g., "Variety Hits"), here it feels unintentional - a local station trying to be all things to its entire community, rather than something essential to a core audience.

Example 1: 
Mariah Carey’s 2009 cover of "I Want to Know What Love Is" (targets Late Millennials/Boomers) → Walker Hayes’ "AA" (targets Gen Z country-pop fans).
Issue: 
These songs appeal to listeners with a 40-year age gap. Few stations successfully bridge this divide without dayparting.

Example 2:
Post Malone’s moody 2024 track (Gen Z) → Michael Jackson’s 1993 gospel ballad (Gen X).
Issue:
The tonal shift risks alienating both audiences. Gen Z may perceive the older track as "mom and dad’s music," while Gen X may tune out during Gen Z-focused cuts.

2) Inconsistent Sonic Identity

The playlist veers from TikTok-fueled pop (Sabrina Carpenter, Alex Warren) to ’90s soft rock (Aerosmith’s 5:55 ballad) to global dance hits (Shakira, Rosé & Bruno Mars).

Result:
No clear "sound" emerges. Is this station nostalgic, trend-forward, or adult-leaning? Without clarity, listeners struggle to form habits.

3) Missed Opportunities with Gen Z/Millennials

The station is playing Gen Z hits (Post Malone, Gigi Perez) but not prioritizing them. These tracks feel isolated amid older material, suggesting a reluctance to fully commit to younger listeners.

Data Insight:
Gen Z discovers music via TikTok and streaming, but they stay with radio when stations curate a consistent vibe (e.g., "Today’s Hits + Recurrents"). This playlist’s scattergun approach undermines that.

4) Legacy Artists as Band-Aids

Michael Jackson, Madonna, and Janet Jackson are iconic, but their inclusion here feels reactive ("safe spins") rather than strategic.

Example: 
"Together Again" (1997) and "Frozen" (1998) could anchor a throwback hour, but sandwiched between Gen Z tracks, they disrupt flow.

Why this matters:

Audience erosion: Listeners gravitate toward stations that reflect their identity. A 55-year-old Aerosmith fan and a 19-year-old Post Malone listener rarely overlap.

Competitive risk: If the national stations own defined sounds (e.g., "90s & 2000s Throwbacks," "Top 40 Now"), this station becomes a "sometimes" option, not a daily habit.

Next: Strategic Recommendations

Strategic Recommendations 

1) Pick a Primary Audience

Option A: Gen Z/Millennials (15–34) → Tighten rotations around 2020s hits, recurrents (2015–2023), and select throwbacks (e.g., Shakira’s "Waka Waka" as a nostalgic millennial touchstone).

Option B: Millennials/Gen X (25–54) → Focus on 1990s–2010s pop/rock with sprinkles of newer tracks that fit the vibe (e.g., Ed Sheeran’s "Beautiful People").

2) Daypart for Demographics

Mornings/Afternoons: Younger skew (Gen Z/Millennials) with upbeat, social-media-fueled hits.
Evenings: Older skew (Millennials/Gen X) with deeper cuts and ballads.

3) Fix the "Whiplash" Spins

→ Separate Michael Jackson and Aerosmith from Gen Z tracks. Use them to anchor themed segments (e.g., "Throwback Lunch").

→Replace jarring transitions (e.g., Post Malone → Michael Jackson) with bridges (e.g., Post Malone → The Weeknd).

4) Audit the Gold Libary

Mariah Carey’s "I Want to Know What Love Is" could work in an Adult Contemporary format but clashes with Gen Z country (Walker Hayes). Decide: Is this station nostalgic or current?

Conclusion

This playlist has strong ingredients but lacks a recipe. Right now, it’s a buffet where listeners grab one dish but leave hungry for cohesion. By refining the target audience and smoothing transitions, this station could own a demographic - without abandoning variety.

Need a fresh ear or some external guidance on your playlist strategy? 
 We’ll analyze one hour of your programming for free to boost flow and engagement (one per station/cluster)
 Let’s talk.

Share on Facebook
Share on Linkedin